You are here

World issues, national agenda on parade

Published: 
Sunday, May 1, 2016

Ryan Hadeed

For most of history’s classical period, the Greek nation was a collection of city-states that spanned the southern region of the Balkan Peninsula. Though possessing a common language and culture, they spent much of their time fighting each other in small-scale conflicts for regional supremacy. It took the threat of an invasion from the Persian Empire to unite them in a common effort. But before the brave Spartan sacrifice at Thermopylae, and the decisive Athenian-led naval victory at Salamis, the only thing that brought them together was the Olympic Games. Dating as far back as 776 BC, and taking place at the sanctuary of Olympia, they were held in tribute of all-father Zeus, the god of thunder. The grand spectacle was a focal point for the celebration of the Panhellenic identity, featuring religious celebrations and artistic showcases along with the all-important athletic competitions. So important and sacrosanct was the event that a special ‘truce’ was observed so that athletes could travel to the games in safety. That, however, didn’t necessarily make it a truly ‘amicable’ environment, as nationalism and political intrigue often overshadowed the rivalries of the sporting participants.

Unfortunately, controversy is something that the Olympics has never been able to completely insulate itself from. While it should be all about the athletics, it frequently becomes a very public forum where world issues and national agendas are on parade long before the opening ceremony begins. Even pertaining to some of its iconic symbols, like the ‘eternal flame’ and ‘torch relay’, these are rituals that were established as part of the Berlin games (1936); an impressive display of pageantry and propaganda aimed to glorify the Nazi regime. Ideologies would again take centre stage a few decades later when the Olympics became a geo-political microcosm of the tug-of-war between Democracy and Communism. With teams USA and USSR mutually boycotting each other’s hosting of the games (1980 and 1984 respectively); yet another effect of the Cold War. Even then not all disputes have been bloodless, as with the tragedy of the Munich games (1972) when members of the Israeli team were brutally murdered by Palestinian terrorists. The list of grievances, I’m afraid, is quite long.

Yet despite such upsets, the games have always persevered to maintain the focus on the athletes themselves. But as ecumenical as the involvement may be, like most international institutions, the contest unintentionally favours the countries of the developed world. In having an abundance of financial resources, they are able to field sizeable team contingents, which results in their achieving the lion’s share of accolades. But more than simply throwing money at the cause, there’s also their access to state-of-the-art training methods and equipment. I remember that prior to the London games (2012), I read an article highlighting how sensors was attached to the bodies of US. Olympic swimmers were mapping their strokes for the purpose of maximising their technique. While I was intrigued by the possible medical applications of this technology, I also contemplated what it meant with respect to fairness. A cash-strapped country may be hard-pressed to maintain a 'long course' pool, let alone afford a qualified coach. It's advantages and/or deficiencies like these that don’t exactly make the games a level playing field.

So are the games all that it’s cracked up to be? Why would individuals want to spend their entire lives training, sacrificing, and dreaming of being an Olympian when there’s such a slim opportunity for success? Of course, there’s no greater glory than winning a medal and being considered among the finest in the sport. But to do your best, especially when competing against the best, embodies the comradery and universal nature of sportsmanship. The official motto of the games, which was supplied by Pierre de Coubertin at the creation of the International Olympic Committee in 1894, is the Latin hendiatris, "Citius, Altius, Fortius," translated as, "Faster, Higher, Stronger." It simply and plainly emphasises its dedication to physical excellence. But there’s another, lesser known motto that was also suggested by Mr Coubertin which states that, "The most important thing is not to win but to take part." It’s a brilliant sentiment, one that should be embraced in everything that we do.

If a Greek athlete who lived 2,500 years ago were transported through time, he would look upon the modern Olympic Games as something that was both very strange and very familiar. He would probably think that our practices are ridiculous: like the changing of its location every four years, to the number of sporting activities and most of all, the wearing of clothes. But he would none-the-less applaud the fact that the ‘spirit’ of the event is alive and well. Indeed, there are few honours than can compare to representing your home country and being cheered on by your fellow countrymen. Because just as his ancient gods were pleased by blood, toil, sweat, and tears–so too are we inspired by feats of human greatness. 

Disclaimer

User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.

Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.

Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.

Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.

Before posting, please refer to the Community Standards, Terms and conditions and Privacy Policy

User profiles registered through fake social media accounts may be deleted without notice.